Discussion about this post

User's avatar
D’Arcy's avatar

I enjoyed the article. I just want to express my disagreement with the conclusion and give my take.

We all feel that knee jerk reaction sometimes - “the government needs to step in!”, but after ten years of liberals, I’m totally against this. It will take extreme amounts of convincing to get me to a point where I would agree that the government’s purview should expand

Better solution: stick to reputable institutions (which could include substacks or YouTube channels) rather “bushwhacking” yourself without a guide. You’re not a journalist. You have no expertise in getting the truth. Stay in your lane. Pay for valuable service.

Consumers seeking information will figure it out. If somebody dies in the meantime, that’s fine. People die due to myriad factors. The world isn’t “safe”. Anyone who struggles with this notion needs to grow up and take responsibility.

Anyone who is bothered by having had this experience - drowning in clickbait - should be searching now for those institutions that stayed faithful. If I’m going to Mexico next month, where should I get my news? A little bit of cultural evolution here will be sufficient, imo.

Gerald Pelchat's avatar

"Disinformation needs to be addressed " is where the problem starts: western Govts have turned it into an art form and suggesting they are the ones to fix it is just inviting the fox into the hen house. Your first and best defense is believing nothing you read on social media until you can authenticate for yourself. I consider social media as entertainment first and as authentic somewhere down the line. It is the territory of bots, trolls and special interest orgs and if they can't be bothered to post their real names I give their posts zero credibility on face value.

24 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?