Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Quynn Phillips's avatar

Intellectually, I get (and agree with) all the reasons why NATO countries should avoid imposing a no-fly zone over Ukraine. But it's impossible not to be moved by the first-hand requests of the people on the ground who are suffering from this unprovoked invasion and believe that we should do more than we are doing... Sherman was right: War is cruelty, war is hell.

Expand full comment
Roy Brander's avatar

It was frightening to read the comments below Matt Gurney's NP column on "Missiles-but-not-MIGs" the other day. Postmedia comments are a swamp, of course, about 90% anti-vaxxer in a 90% vaxed nation....but, still, reading actual nuclear jingoism, "what's he going to do, call you a bad name", shook me. They really seemed to believe we could just shoot down his most-prized warplanes and not risk even a tactical nuke, that Putin would just not Go There.

That's the problem with the NFZ request, really: even Russia would want one last warning level before nuclear attack. They have a couple of thousand "backpack nukes" that are <1 kilotonne yield, and only 50kg to carry around. Dropping one of those ON UKRAINE, would be their way of giving a warning shot. Only Ukraine would pay a nuclear price.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts