Discussion about this post

Commenting has been turned off for this post
Lou Fougere's avatar

Finally a sensible and pragmatic approach both domestically and globally. Not easy to implement but necessary to expedite. The clock is ticking. More action , less value signalling.

Expand full comment
Sutha Kamal's avatar

Humans have used exponentially more energy, year after year, since the industrial revolution. (https://ourworldindata.org/energy-key-charts#energy-mix)

Conserving energy spend is a waste of time: it ignores the reality of global human energy consumption and the reality that Canada’s too small to matter from the perspective of absolute amount of atmospheric pollutants created.

For avoidance of doubt, Canada getting to Net Zero will not make *any* difference to whether the world hits 1.5 vs 2C. If the authors disagree, they should bring data demonstrating otherwise.

Instead, Canada should focus on two environmental themes:

1- low carbon (e.g. nuclear, where we invented the CANDU reactor type) power generation

2- moonshot R&D to dramatically improve carbon sequestration capacity.

Anything else is a waste of time (won’t change the ultimate concentration of atmospheric carbon enough to matter) and money (conserving doesn’t create growth… developing innovative new technologies *does*).

Lastly, this essay is far from rigorous in its environmental, technical or economic analysis. IMO it’s below the threshold I expect from the usually well-reasoned arguments in The Line.

Expand full comment
24 more comments...

No posts