LIVE SOON: Canada's new military plan, with Christian Leuprecht
How we'll hit 2%. What it means to hit 2%. And what 2% will really cost.
Hello, friends. We’re splitting On The Line’s releases into audio and video. Videos are now in the late afternoon/evenings, and you can check ‘em out in all our usual places. (Audio options can all be found here, as ever.)
This week on On The Line, Matt Gurney speaks with Christian Leuprecht — professor at the Royal Military College and Queen’s University, editor of the Canadian Military Journal, senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, and visiting fellow at the Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies in Brussels. His forthcoming book is The Military’s Response to Domestic Crises and Global Pandemics: Civil-Military Relations for Domestic Operations.
Their conversation follows Prime Minister Mark Carney’s major announcement earlier this week: a historic, immediate increase in Canadian defence spending to hit the NATO target of 2% of GDP. Some of that figure is, yes, a little creative from an accounting perspective. But much of it is real new money — and the scope is massive.
But this isn’t about expanding capabilities. It’s about finally repairing a military that’s been allowed to decay. The money won't go as far as you might think.
Matt and Christian unpack the geopolitical pressures driving the decision — and the political complacency that’s defined Canada’s defence posture for nearly 75 years. They talk about the procurement bottlenecks that will make implementation painful, the civil-military dynamics that will determine who’s actually accountable, and whether allies in Washington and Europe will be impressed. And finally, they get into the hard questions: how do you sustain this level of spending when Canada is already running structural deficits and showing little economic growth? And for Carney — is this a bold strategic play, or a long-term political gamble? Will the Canadian public really want to spend the amount of money all of this is going to cost?
As always, like and subscribe at ReadTheLine.ca. You can also follow us on your favourite podcast app so you never miss an episode. Share it with a friend, post about it online, or just drop it into the group chat. You know the one.
Join the queue for the video now — it goes live in 30 minutes, at 5 p.m. Eastern (3 p.m. Mountain).
You can also watch this episode of On The Line, and all our podcast releases, on our Twitter feeds: Matt’s is here. The Line’s is here. Jen is here.
On The Line wouldn’t be possible without our sponsors:
This episode of On The Line is brought to you by the Métis Nation of Ontario. June is Indigenous History Month, a time to reflect on how Canada came to be.
When American forces marched north in the War of 1812, Métis in the Upper Great Lakes stood in defence of the lands and waters they called home. They fought at Fort Mackinac, at Sault Ste. Marie, and at St. Joseph Island alongside the British to protect what would become Canada. The Crown promised land and security in return. But when the war ended, those promises faded. Métis families who left Drummond Island to remain free from American rule reestablished themselves in Penetanguishene and Sault Ste. Marie. The British promised they’d be able to live free and undisturbed — only to have their land sold out from under them in the following decades. Still, they stayed, built homes, raised families, and held onto their rights.
In 2003, the Supreme Court of Canada affirmed what they had always known: that one of the Upper Great Lakes Métis settlements — the Sault Ste. Marie Métis community — holds rights protected under the Constitution.
For over two hundred years, Métis in the Upper Great Lakes have fought for this country, contributed to its economy, and defended their place in it. To learn more, visit OntarioMetisFacts.com.
And we love you, our viewers. Be sure to follow us on all of our platforms, including our new ones — those will also be used for video broadcasting just as soon as we can jump through all the hurdles.
The Line is entirely reader and advertiser funded — no federal subsidy for us! If you value our work, have already subscribed, and still worry about what will happen when the conventional media finishes collapsing, please make a donation today.
The Line is Canada’s last, best hope for irreverent commentary. We reject bullshit. We love lively writing. Please consider supporting us by subscribing. Please follow us on social media! Facebook x 2: On The Line Podcast here, and The Line Podcast here. Instagram. Also: TikTok. BlueSky. LinkedIn. Matt’s Twitter. The Line’s Twitter.Jen’s Twitter. Contact us by email: lineeditor@protonmail.com.
Fantastic interview. Full of top notch information that cannot help but better inform an opinion about Canada's military while framing current announcements within an understanding about where we are, how we got here, and how can we get to where we need to be to meet our obligations. Very informative.
One thing I had not thought about that Christian highlighted was the opportunity for Canada to create and supply a (relatively well protected by geography and under a US security umbrella) NATO manufactured arsenal that would create a very strong deterrence factor for any kind of Putin invasion based on quickly exhausting limited and rapidly depleted NATO armaments and supplies. This opportunity could be huge for Canada to reclaim an important strategic global position (elevating out foreign affairs on that stage) while, at the same time, offering young Canadians employment in cutting edge defence technologies and contracts as well as first world expertise on evolving tactics and equipment. Twin this military investment with becoming what Carney claims is a desired superpower status in energy production and distribution and Canada has a very real chance of turning the declining country around and leading us into a much improved future. If that is the legacy Trump tariffs bring about for Canada, then let's get started on building it.
The lack of deterrence fosters hot war with countries currently engaged with us in a very active and dedicated cold war; if we follow this informed advice for Canada to increase our role in functional deterrence (if pursued with dedicated political will), we have a chance to show real 'elbows up' garumba.
I have many friends and close family members in Latvia, some of whom are just 30km from the Belarusian border. They understand the threat better than we do, and are also very thankful that Canadians are there supporting them.
I'm (cautiously) hopeful that this announcement will continue to help hold the line.