Discussion about this post

User's avatar
George Skinner's avatar

A lot of the Justin Trudeau agenda was inspired by a nostalgic view of Canada when Pierre Trudeau was in government, and the current Liberals' approach to the CBC and Canadian news media appears to derive from similar sentiment. CBC funding has been cruising on pleasant memories of Hockey Night in Canada, The Beachcombers, and Mr. Dress-Up for decades; news media like big newspapers are regarded as Important because they used to be Important.

It's all out of touch with today's reality, where the top-rated CBC show is re-runs of "Schitt's Creek" (a series that ended 5 years ago) and newspaper circulation numbers that have been on a steady decline since the '90s. The fact is that both CBC and the legacy news media need to count themselves lucky that Mark Carney is focused on other problems and hasn't yet pursued any real efforts to curtail government spending. A rational appraisal of current realities would reveal media subsidies to be a pretty frivolous expenditure compared with almost anything else.

Expand full comment
J. Rock's avatar

Good column. Jen and Matt often talk about this issue and how Legacy Media has to face modern realities. It's a dilemma for all of us because good journalism is necessary to maintain that a healthy democracy but it requires a budget and it's difficult to hire investigators on a on what's generated by a podcast. All countries need a national broadcaster and, while the CBC's budget seems huge, it's per capita funding is a fraction of what other countries invest in their National broadcasters. CBC should have enough money that it doesn't need advertising. Oh, and yes, CBC does need a serious house cleaning and revamp.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts