Discussion about this post

User's avatar
George Skinner's avatar

This reminds me of the Star Trek episode "The Cage": the Talosians, a dying and physically diminished race yet in control due to their telepathic powers, admonish human Captain Pike "Right thinking will be rewarded. Wrong thinking will be punished!" It doesn't occur to the Talosians that their mental powers aren't sufficient to maintain domination over humans, nor that they will be utterly at the humans' mercy once Pike and crew figure out how to overcome them.

The Liberals have brought in this legislation in an effort to squelch out the "wrong thinking" of their opponents, and seem to be working from the assumption that only they will be able to make use of the powers provided by the online harms act. It doesn't seem to have occurred to them that these powers could soon be at the disposal of their political opponents, and they could soon be the people condemned for "wrong thinking." In the more robust free speech rights of the US, this act would be quickly struck down by the courts. It could potentially face a similar fate in Canada, but unfortunately I suspect many of the current Supreme Court justices will be susceptible to the progressive idea that some speech must be banned because it's inherently harmful, stretching current provisions aimed at neo-Nazis to progressive bugbears.

Expand full comment
I'd Use My Name but Internet's avatar

The thought of some appointed, beholden federal bureaucrats deciding what constitutes "misinformation" frightens me. Hell, this article could be considered misinformation if the head of right-speech decides it misrepresents the risk of the legislation.

Expand full comment
44 more comments...

No posts