Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tildeb's avatar

Maybe it's just me and my 'sunny ways' but throughout most of my life I never saw a telephone phone book filled with names, addresses, and phone numbers as a data breach. In fact, the first thing most of did after receiving the yearly book was check to make sure the personal information it listed was correct. But now? A deadly conspiracy is afoot, I tell you. (It took personal time, effort, and money to remove this information from the public domain and gain an unlisted number... which it was why it was called 'unlisted'. And there was nary a scandal in sight.)

My, how times have changed. Now the risk to safety for this unacceptable breach cannot be overstated and the culprits held to account for their dark motives. Think of the thousands in some form of witness protection who kept their name and stayed determined to exercise their franchise under it, confident that select electoral officers can access this information with no risk but anyone familiar with a phone book casts a long and threatening shadow.

gs's avatar

I notice that the name Stay Free Alberta doesn't appear once in this article.

ie: the organization who actually collected the 306K signatures seeking a referendum.

If you include the 450K signatures Lukaszuk collected, as many as 750K Albertans have signed petitions seeking a referendum on this subject.

The end result CANNOT be no referendum.

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?