Discussion about this post

Commenting has been turned off for this post
Robert Gougeon's avatar

Sorry for being a tad obtuse, but I think I'm missing the point here. There are all these works of popular culture incorporating disease as menacing agents within the plot structure, but somehow sci-fi is 'missing' the significance of this thematic element or failing to give disease its proper form of attention. The point being? Diseases are seldom treated as representing diseases but more often metaphors for something else? Or the issue is ongoing categorizing mistakes, diseases are not treated as sci-fi but supernatural agency? A problem of categorization for librarians?

I feel like I'm not part of the insider cult here, not recognizing the obvious. Of course, disease has long 'plagued' human societies. So when disease shows up in popular culture it should be recognized as...what exactly? How does the evidence of 'fixation' equate with the evidence of 'ignoring'? Again sorry to be fixated, but I seem to be missing the point we've apparently all been, ah, ignoring.

Expand full comment
Mark Ch's avatar

This is very interesting indeed, but I think the writer neglects the way that the real Covid (not actually very serious or contagious, especially by the standards of any of the SF diseases he mentions) has caused the very thing that Body Snatchers was reputed to be a metaphor for: hatred, paranoia (can be construed as irrational fear of the virus or irrational fear of the harmful measures taken to avoid it, your choice), tyranny, and a (quite possibly, at least here in Ontario) permanent change in society to one of discrimination, hypochondria, and authoritarian technocracy.

Expand full comment
25 more comments...

No posts