Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stephen Best's avatar

You're article, in my view, would make sense if you changed the word 'white' to 'privileged.'

Expand full comment
Thom Jane's avatar

Something irked me about your article, Terry,

and I put my finger on it. How can someone with all of your travel and life experience define usefulness so myopically? Even if I accept your arguments that "white people" is the most intellectually honest way of characterizing the "majority populations of most of the Western democracies" and that the citizens of these countries offer nothing but indifference, tokenism, and harm toward the developing world (both a stretch), you never defined useful nor useless. It seems to me that your definition of useful is limited to something like "policies or behaviors that demonstrably improve the welfare of the world's poorest and most violent countries." This is all well and good, but to implicitly define this as people's only "use" with the framing that you did makes your article seem like it was written between TikTok videos. Or "cute" as Col. Pat aptly put it.

Who are you spending your free time with, Terry? My best friend just bought his first house and is learning how to caulk, sand, and paint. Someone else I know is starting her own business to help people who suffer from eating disorders. My dad just retired, took a week off, and is now spending 35 hours a week volunteering at a foodbank. You're right in that these people aren't creating change in the Middle East. But damn it Terry, they aren't useless.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts